|
Post by account_disabled on Dec 4, 2023 5:19:22 GMT
Could be problematic. Retrospectiveness of changes in indirect hedging transactions The most important information from the taxpayer's point of view is that this project provides the possibility of retrospective application of proposed changes to transactions carried out in 2016. This means that taxpayers should follow the current legislative process and then choose which applicable regulation. Safer or easier to comply with. Further changes are likely to occur as part of the legislative process. Shortly after the project was announced, reports emerged that the department planned to make changes Job Function Email List to the project that could significantly change its tone to the detriment of taxpayers. According to information provided by the Transfer Pricing Forum Working Group, the changes being considered. May not simplify the verification of indirect hedging transactions but actually create a new route for verifying counterparties. Our experts constantly monitor projects that are in the advisory phase. The facts of the case include a Polish taxpayer involved in a chain transaction, a Polish supplier, a Polish distributor, a foreign recipient in another EU country, and the goods are sent directly.
|
|